Skip to main content

GenAI Developer Workflow with MLflow

This guide walks you through the complete development lifecycle of GenAI applications and agents, highlighting common challenges and MLflow's recommended solutions. We'll iteratively build both the development workflow and data flow that enables you to create GenAI applications that reliably deliver high-quality responses at optimal cost and latency.

Table of Contents​

Workflow Overview​

The MLflow GenAI development workflow addresses the unique challenges of building reliable AI applications through systematic observation, evaluation, and improvement cycles.

Development Challenges​

Building reliable GenAI applications presents unique challenges that traditional software development practices don't address:

🎯 Quality Assessment Challenge​

  • Problem: Unlike traditional software, GenAI outputs are subjective and context-dependent
  • MLflow Solution: Systematic evaluation with automated scorers and human expert feedback
  • Future Benefit: Consistent quality measurement across development and production

📊 Observability Challenge​

  • Problem: Understanding why GenAI applications fail or produce poor results
  • MLflow Solution: Comprehensive tracing of execution flow, inputs, outputs, and context
  • Future Benefit: Detailed debugging capabilities and performance optimization insights

🔄 Iteration Speed Challenge​

  • Problem: Testing changes against diverse scenarios is time-consuming and manual
  • MLflow Solution: Automated evaluation harness with curated datasets from production traffic
  • Future Benefit: Rapid validation of improvements with confidence in quality maintenance

💰 Cost & Performance Challenge​

  • Problem: Balancing response quality with latency and API costs
  • MLflow Solution: Performance monitoring and cost tracking across different configurations
  • Future Benefit: Data-driven optimization of cost-performance trade-offs

Core Components​

📊 MLflow Traces​

Capture complete execution details of every request, providing:

  • Input/output tracking: Full visibility into data transformations
  • Performance metrics: Latency, token usage, and cost attribution
  • Error analysis: Detailed failure context for debugging
  • Contextual metadata: User, session, and environment information

🧪 Evaluation Harness​

Systematic testing framework that:

  • Runs new versions against historical production scenarios
  • Applies consistent scoring using automated metrics and LLM judges
  • Compares performance across different application versions
  • Validates quality before production deployment

🎯 Automated Scorers​

AI-powered quality assessment that provides:

  • Consistent evaluation: Same criteria applied across development and production
  • Scalable feedback: Automated assessment of large volumes of interactions
  • Expert-aligned ratings: LLM judges trained on domain expert preferences
  • Real-time monitoring: Continuous quality assessment in production

📋 Evaluation Datasets​

Curated collections of test scenarios that:

  • Represent real usage: Built from actual production traffic patterns
  • Include expert annotations: Ground truth labels from domain experts
  • Enable regression testing: Consistent benchmarks across versions
  • Support iterative improvement: Growing collection of edge cases and scenarios

Development Phase​

Initial Application Development​

Key Activities:

  • Instrument your code with MLflow tracing decorators
  • Capture development traces to understand execution flow
  • Iterate rapidly using trace data to identify issues
  • Build initial evaluation datasets from development scenarios

Version Development Process​

Production Phase​

Deployment & Monitoring​

Key Capabilities:

  • Automatic trace collection from all production requests
  • Real-time quality monitoring using automated scorers
  • Performance tracking including latency and cost metrics
  • User feedback integration for quality assessment

Production Data Collection​

Production traces provide valuable insights:

Data TypePurposeUsage
Request/Response PairsQuality assessmentEvaluation dataset creation
Performance MetricsOptimizationCost and latency analysis
Error PatternsDebuggingIssue identification and resolution
User FeedbackQuality validationExpert annotation and scorer training

Evaluation & Improvement​

Systematic Quality Assessment​

Continuous Improvement Cycle​

The evaluation framework enables systematic improvement:

  1. Issue Identification: Use production traces and monitoring to identify quality or performance issues
  2. Root Cause Analysis: Examine detailed trace data to understand failure patterns
  3. Solution Development: Create targeted improvements based on data insights
  4. Systematic Testing: Validate changes using evaluation harness with representative scenarios
  5. Quality Assurance: Ensure new versions don't introduce regressions
  6. Confident Deployment: Deploy validated improvements with quality guarantees

Complete Workflow Integration​

End-to-End Data Flow​

Benefits & Best Practices​

🎯 Quality Assurance Benefits​

  • Consistent evaluation: Same quality criteria across development and production
  • Expert alignment: Automated scorers trained on domain expert preferences
  • Regression prevention: Systematic testing prevents quality degradation
  • Continuous monitoring: Real-time quality assessment in production

📊 Operational Benefits​

  • Complete observability: Full visibility into application behavior
  • Performance optimization: Data-driven cost and latency improvements
  • Rapid debugging: Detailed trace data accelerates issue resolution
  • Scalable monitoring: Automated quality assessment for high-volume applications

🔄 Development Benefits​

  • Faster iteration: Automated evaluation accelerates improvement cycles
  • Confident deployment: Quality validation before production release
  • Data-driven decisions: Evidence-based approach to application improvements
  • Systematic improvement: Structured approach to quality enhancement

💡 Best Practices​

Start Simple, Scale Systematically:

  • Begin with basic tracing and monitoring
  • Gradually add evaluation datasets and automated scorers
  • Implement systematic workflows as your application matures

Align Scorers with Business Goals:

  • Train automated scorers on domain expert preferences
  • Regularly validate scorer performance against human judgment
  • Update scoring criteria as business requirements evolve

Leverage Production Data:

  • Use real user interactions to build evaluation datasets
  • Identify quality issues through production trace analysis
  • Create test scenarios from actual usage patterns

Implement Continuous Feedback Loops:

  • Collect user feedback systematically
  • Monitor quality trends over time
  • Iterate based on data insights rather than assumptions

This comprehensive workflow enables you to build, deploy, and continuously improve GenAI applications with confidence in their quality, performance, and reliability.

MLflow's GenAI developer workflow provides the foundation for building reliable, high-quality AI applications that deliver consistent value to your users.